Current:Home > FinanceKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -Edge Finance Strategies
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
FinLogic FinLogic Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-10 01:53:06
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (687)
Related
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Colts star Jonathan Taylor 'excused' from training camp due to 'personal matter'
- Judge who signed Kansas newspaper search warrant had 2 DUI arrests, reports say
- Abbott is wrong to define unlawful immigration at Texas border as an 'invasion', Feds say
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- Foes of Biden’s Climate Plan Sought a ‘New Solyndra,’ but They Have yet to Dig Up Scandal
- Britney Spears’ Lawyer Previously Detailed Plan for Sam Asghari Prenup to Protect Her “Best Interests”
- Sex abuse scandal at Northern California women's prison spurs lawsuit vs. feds
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- US Army soldier accused of killing his wife in Alaska faces court hearing
Ranking
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Standards Still Murky for Disposing Oilfield Wastewater in Texas Rivers
- North Carolina’s governor visits rural areas to promote Medicaid expansion delayed by budget wait
- Britney Spears’ Lawyer Previously Detailed Plan for Sam Asghari Prenup to Protect Her “Best Interests”
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Which digital pinball machines are right for your home?
- The Killers booed in former Soviet republic of Georgia after bringing Russian fan onstage
- Rory McIlroy, Brian Harman, Grandma Susie highlight first round at 2023 BMW Championship
Recommendation
Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
As glaciers melt, a new study seeks protection of ecosystems that emerge in their place
Heavy rain and landslides have killed at least 72 people this week in an Indian Himalayan state
US Army soldier accused of killing his wife in Alaska faces court hearing
Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
USC study reveals Hollywood studios are still lagging when it comes to inclusivity
Marcus Jordan Says Larsa Pippen Wedding Is In the Works and Sparks Engagement Speculation
Hawaii governor vows to block land grabs as fire-ravaged Maui rebuilds