Current:Home > MarketsUS judge to weigh cattle industry request to halt Colorado wolf reintroduction -Edge Finance Strategies
US judge to weigh cattle industry request to halt Colorado wolf reintroduction
View
Date:2025-04-13 05:22:35
A federal judge is set to consider on Thursday a request by Colorado’s cattle industry to block the impending reintroduction of gray wolves to the state under a voter-approved initiative.
State wildlife officials plan to capture up to 10 wolves from Oregon and begin releasing them in Colorado by Dec. 31 as they race to meet a deadline imposed under a 2020 ballot proposal that passed by a narrow margin.
The animals would be among the first gray wolves in Colorado in decades.
The Gunnison County Stockgrowers’ Association and Colorado Cattlemen’s Association filed a lawsuit Monday to halt the releases. They claim the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service failed to adequately review Colorado’s plan to release up to 50 wolves onto state and private land over the next several years.
Judge Regina M. Rodriguez scheduled a 10 a.m. hearing at the federal courthouse in Denver to hear arguments in the case.
Gray wolves were exterminated across most of the U.S. by the 1930s under government-sponsored poisoning and trapping campaigns. They received endangered species protections in 1975, when there were about 1,000 left in northern Minnesota.
Wolves have since rebounded in the Great Lakes region. They’ve also returned to numerous western states — Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Oregon, Washington and, most recently, California — following an earlier reintroduction effort that brought wolves from Canada to central Idaho and Yellowstone National Park in the 1990s.
An estimated 7,500 wolves in about 1,400 packs now roam parts of the contiguous U.S. Their return to the central Rocky Mountains of Colorado would achieve a longstanding dream of wildlife advocates and fill in one of the last remaining major gaps in the species’ historical range in the western U.S.
A small number of wolves from the Yellowstone region journeyed across Wyoming to Colorado in recent years. Some of those animals were shot when they wandered back into Wyoming, where shooting them is legal.
Colorado officials say they are currently managing only two wolves in the state.
The plan to establish a permanent wolf population through releases of animals captured elsewhere has sharpened divides between rural and urban residents. City and suburban dwellers largely voted to reintroduce the apex predators into rural areas where ranchers worry about attacks on livestock that help drive local economies.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service published an environmental review in September of what is called a 10(j) rule, which permits the killing of wolves in Colorado under certain scenarios — particularly in the defense of livestock — even though the animals are protected federally as an endangered species.
The rule is a key piece of Colorado’s reintroduction plan. The livestock groups contend the review of the rule failed to capture the full consequences of wolf reintroduction.
Colorado Assistant Attorney General Lisa Reynolds requested Thursday’s hearing after the livestock groups sought a temporary restraining order from Rodriguez to stop the wolf releases. Reynolds said in a Wednesday court filing that the releases would not begin prior to Dec. 17.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services spokesperson Joe Szuszwalak declined to comment, citing ongoing litigation.
veryGood! (591)
Related
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Louisiana US Rep. Garret Graves won’t seek reelection, citing a new congressional map
- Man charged in 'race war' plot targeting Black people, Jews, Muslims ahead of election
- When do new episodes of 'The Boys' come out? Full Season 4 episode schedule, where to watch
- Trump's 'stop
- Man killed, child hurt in shooting at Maryland high school during little league football game
- 4 Florida officers indicted for 2019 shootout with robbers that killed a UPS driver and passerby
- NY governor’s subway mask ban proposal sparks debate over right to anonymous protest
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Does chlorine damage hair? Here’s how to protect your hair this swim season.
Ranking
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- Porzingis available for Celtics as they try to wrap up sweep of NBA Finals against Mavericks
- Elephant in Thailand unexpectedly gives birth to rare set of miracle twins
- 28 people left dangling, stuck upside down on ride at Oaks Amusement Park: Video
- Average rate on 30
- A few midwives seek to uphold Native Hawaiian birth traditions. Would a state law jeopardize them?
- Argentina men’s national team friendly vs. Guatemala: Messi scores goal, how to live stream
- You may owe the IRS money on Monday — skipping payment could cost you hundreds of dollars
Recommendation
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Letter Openers
'Predator catchers' cover the USA, live-streaming their brand of vigilante justice
US Coast Guard says investigation into Titan submersible will take longer than initially projected
Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
Q&A: Choked by Diesel Pollution From Generators, Cancer Rates in Beirut Surge by 30 Percent
Treasure trove recovered from ancient shipwrecks 5,000 feet underwater in South China Sea
NY governor’s subway mask ban proposal sparks debate over right to anonymous protest